<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Domain Rights &#187; Anti-cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.domainrights.org/category/anti-cybersquatting-consumer-protection-act/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.domainrights.org</link>
	<description>Blogging the rights of domain name owners.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 14:19:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Pluto Domain Services Found To Have Engaged In a Pattern of Bad Faith Cybersquatting</title>
		<link>http://www.domainrights.org/2009/02/23/pluto-domain-services-found-to-have-engaged-in-a-pattern-of-bad-faith-cybersquatting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.domainrights.org/2009/02/23/pluto-domain-services-found-to-have-engaged-in-a-pattern-of-bad-faith-cybersquatting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Enrico Schaefer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti-cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[icann]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:tcattorney.typepad.com://91a9e8eafaae634aa402fece91aabe58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Domainfight.net provides the following returns for “Pluto Domain Services” as a respondent in UDRP arbitrations. There is no question that Pluto Domain Services is a habitual cybersquatter under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy. Note the bancopopularpr.com decision specifically...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CybersquattingDomainNameDisputeAttorneysLawyers/~4/545909592" height="1">]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Domainfight.net provides the following returns for “Pluto Domain Services” as a respondent in UDRP arbitrations. There is no question that Pluto Domain Services is a habitual cybersquatter under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy. Note the bancopopularpr.com decision specifically&#8230;<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CybersquattingDomainNameDisputeAttorneysLawyers/~4/545909592" height="1" width="1"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.domainrights.org/2009/02/23/pluto-domain-services-found-to-have-engaged-in-a-pattern-of-bad-faith-cybersquatting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pluto Domain Services Found To Have Engaged In a Pattern of Bad Faith Cybersquatting</title>
		<link>http://www.domainrights.org/2009/02/23/pluto-domain-services-found-to-have-engaged-in-a-pattern-of-bad-faith-cybersquatting-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.domainrights.org/2009/02/23/pluto-domain-services-found-to-have-engaged-in-a-pattern-of-bad-faith-cybersquatting-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Enrico Schaefer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti-cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[icann]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:tcattorney.typepad.com://ead74e25835e5550fcd5acb4c76688e7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Domainfight.net provides the following returns for “Pluto Domain Services” as a respondent in UDRP arbitrations. There is no question that Pluto Domain Services is a habitual cybersquatter under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy. Note the bancopopularpr.com decision specifically...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Domainfight.net provides the following returns for “Pluto Domain Services” as a respondent in UDRP arbitrations. There is no question that Pluto Domain Services is a habitual cybersquatter under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy. Note the bancopopularpr.com decision specifically&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.domainrights.org/2009/02/23/pluto-domain-services-found-to-have-engaged-in-a-pattern-of-bad-faith-cybersquatting-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Navigation Catalyst a Typical Domainer?  All Domainers are not Cybersquatters.</title>
		<link>http://www.domainrights.org/2008/08/04/is-navigation-catalyst-a-typical-domainer-all-domainers-are-not-cybersquatters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.domainrights.org/2008/08/04/is-navigation-catalyst-a-typical-domainer-all-domainers-are-not-cybersquatters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Enrico Schaefer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti-cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domainers Beware: Cybersquatting Damages Under ACPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[icann]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:tcattorney.typepad.com://f942c703f79fe7ad6fc20d74e68f0aba</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eric Goldman at the Technology &#038; Marketing Law Blog has a post about the recent ACPA injunction entered against Navigation Catalyst and registrar Basic Fusion. Mr. Golman states that this is the first decisions against a "domainer" which of course...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CybersquattingDomainNameDisputeAttorneysLawyers/~4/355384235" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric Goldman at the Technology &#038; Marketing Law Blog has a post about the recent ACPA injunction entered against Navigation Catalyst and registrar Basic Fusion. Mr. Golman states that this is the first decisions against a &#8220;domainer&#8221; which of course&#8230;<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CybersquattingDomainNameDisputeAttorneysLawyers/~4/355384235" height="1" width="1"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.domainrights.org/2008/08/04/is-navigation-catalyst-a-typical-domainer-all-domainers-are-not-cybersquatters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hobbits v. Hobbitts: Generic Mark Argument Won&#8217;t Prevent Panel From Seeing Pay Per Click Parking as Bad Faith</title>
		<link>http://www.domainrights.org/2008/07/11/hobbits-v-hobbitts-generic-mark-argument-wont-prevent-panel-from-seeing-pay-per-click-parking-as-bad-faith/</link>
		<comments>http://www.domainrights.org/2008/07/11/hobbits-v-hobbitts-generic-mark-argument-wont-prevent-panel-from-seeing-pay-per-click-parking-as-bad-faith/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 18:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Enrico Schaefer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti-cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domainers Beware: Cybersquatting Damages Under ACPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UDRP - Domain Name Dispute Decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[icann]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:tcattorney.typepad.com://0e9e332435960b0132e10dd63ae2cd30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seemingly generic domain names can often turn into a trademark nightmare when used in combination with pay per click parking pages. A recent proceeding in front of the World Intellectual Property Organization demonstrates that a registrant’s inability to control these...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CybersquattingDomainNameDisputeAttorneysLawyers/~4/332923161" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seemingly generic domain names can often turn into a trademark nightmare when used in combination with pay per click parking pages. A recent proceeding in front of the World Intellectual Property Organization demonstrates that a registrant’s inability to control these&#8230;<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CybersquattingDomainNameDisputeAttorneysLawyers/~4/332923161" height="1" width="1"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.domainrights.org/2008/07/11/hobbits-v-hobbitts-generic-mark-argument-wont-prevent-panel-from-seeing-pay-per-click-parking-as-bad-faith/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Cybersquatted Domain Names for Your Buck With One UDRP Complaint</title>
		<link>http://www.domainrights.org/2008/03/05/more-cybersquatted-domain-names-for-your-buck-with-one-udrp-complaint/</link>
		<comments>http://www.domainrights.org/2008/03/05/more-cybersquatted-domain-names-for-your-buck-with-one-udrp-complaint/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 15:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Enrico Schaefer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti-cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersquatting Defense & Trademark Lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domainers, Domain Tasting, Cybersquatting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Typosquatting & Cybersquatting of Domain Names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[icann]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:tcattorney.typepad.com://6b6f97719f5c5e90364d44d96f9e7533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rule 3(c) of the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy states, “The complaint may relate to more than one domain name, provided that the domain names are registered by the same domain-name holder.” This means that if a...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CybersquattingDomainNameDisputeAttorneysLawyers/~4/246183064" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rule 3(c) of the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy states, “The complaint may relate to more than one domain name, provided that the domain names are registered by the same domain-name holder.” This means that if a&#8230;<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CybersquattingDomainNameDisputeAttorneysLawyers/~4/246183064" height="1" width="1"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.domainrights.org/2008/03/05/more-cybersquatted-domain-names-for-your-buck-with-one-udrp-complaint/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
