Archive for the 'Anti-cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act' Category

Pluto Domain Services Found To Have Engaged In a Pattern of Bad Faith Cybersquatting

Domainfight.net provides the following returns for “Pluto Domain Services” as a respondent in UDRP arbitrations. There is no question that Pluto Domain Services is a habitual cybersquatter under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy. Note the bancopopularpr.com decision specifically…

Pluto Domain Services Found To Have Engaged In a Pattern of Bad Faith Cybersquatting

Domainfight.net provides the following returns for “Pluto Domain Services” as a respondent in UDRP arbitrations. There is no question that Pluto Domain Services is a habitual cybersquatter under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy. Note the bancopopularpr.com decision specifically…

Is Navigation Catalyst a Typical Domainer? All Domainers are not Cybersquatters.

Eric Goldman at the Technology & Marketing Law Blog has a post about the recent ACPA injunction entered against Navigation Catalyst and registrar Basic Fusion. Mr. Golman states that this is the first decisions against a “domainer” which of course…

Hobbits v. Hobbitts: Generic Mark Argument Won’t Prevent Panel From Seeing Pay Per Click Parking as Bad Faith

Seemingly generic domain names can often turn into a trademark nightmare when used in combination with pay per click parking pages. A recent proceeding in front of the World Intellectual Property Organization demonstrates that a registrant’s inability to control these…

More Cybersquatted Domain Names for Your Buck With One UDRP Complaint

Rule 3(c) of the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy states, “The complaint may relate to more than one domain name, provided that the domain names are registered by the same domain-name holder.” This means that if a…